Table 1 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of Mismatch Negativity (MMN) z-scores. More positive z-scores indicate smaller MMN amplitude relative to HC norms (i.e., a greater MMN deficit)
Effect | DF | F | p-value | Follow-up testsa |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Group | 1159 | 6.138 | 0.029 | ESZÂ >Â HC |
 Deviant Type (DUR, FREQ, DBL) | 1.929 | 0.431 | 0.643 |  |
 Fronto-Central Lead (Frontal, Central) | 1 | 1.5306 | 0.218 |  |
 Lateral Lead (Left, Midline, Right) | 1.760 | 3.217 | 0.048 |  |
Group*Deviant Type | 1.929 | 0.472 | 0.617 | Â |
Group*Fronto-Central Lead | 1 | 1.043 | 0.309 | Â |
Group*Lateral Lead | 1.760 | 1.992 | 0.144 | Â |
Group*Lateral Lead*Deviant Type | 3.377 | 0.604 | 0.632 | Â |
Group*Fronto-Central Lead*Deviant Type | 1.992 | 5.326 | 0.005 | Â |
 Group*Fronto-Central Lead for DUR | 1 | 0.338 | 0.562 |  |
 Group*Fronto-Central Lead for FREQ | 1 | 0.041 | 0.839 |  |
 Group*Fronto-Central Lead for DBL | 1 | 7.625 | 0.006 |  |
  Fronto-Central Lead effect in ESZ | 55 | 4.336 | <0.001 | Frontal > Central |
  Group Effect at Frontal Leads | 1156 | 8.828 | 0.003 | ESZ > HC |
  Group Effect at Central Leads | 1156 | 2.608 | 0.108 |  |
 Fronto-Central Lead *Deviant Type in ESZ | 1.832 | 10.659 | <0.001 |  |
  Deviant Type effect at Frontal Leads | 1.964 | 2.571 | 0.082 | DBL > DUR |
  Deviant Type effect at Central Leads | 1.975 | 0.393 | 0.673 |  |
  Fronto-Central Lead effect for DUR | 55 | -0.906 | 0.369 |  |
  Fronto-Central Lead effect for FREQ | 55 | -0.169 | 0.866 |  |
  Fronto-Central Lead effect for DBL | 55 | 4.336 | <0.001 | Frontal > Central |
 Group*Deviant Type at Frontal Leads | 1.922 | 1.449 | 0.237 |  |
 Group*Deviant Type at Central Leads | 1.938 | 0.325 | 0.716 |  |
Group*Fronto-Central Lead*Lateral Lead | 1.776 | 0.787 | 0.443 | Â |