Skip to main content

Table 1 Percentages of IEDs among non-epileptic ASD children

From: EEG changes associated with autistic spectrum disorders

Paper

N

% of subjects with IEDs

Location

Epilepsy excluded*

Comments

Small, 1975

147

64 (included an unspecified low% of slow wave abnormalities)

Mainly focal and seen in all locations.

Yes

A single recording yielded 40% abnormalities, 2 studies 60% and 3 studies 80%.

Gillberg et al., 1987

15

27

 

Yes

Five additional children with ASD and epilepsy all had abnormal EEGs.

Rossi et al., 1995

81

25%

Focal and multifocal. 45% centro-temporal.

Yes

Photoparoxysmal response in some children.

Tuchman & Rapin 1997

335

8%

50% centro-temporal

Yes

14% in non-epileptics but with history of deterioration.

Kawasaki et al., 1997

96

31.3

Frontal

Yes

A control group with intellectual development delay and exhibiting IEDs, had very significantly less frontal lobe discharges.

Lewine 1999

18, EEG

22

Paroxysmal MEG activity mainly deep into sylvian plane.

Yes

All children with evidence of regression. Notice the progression in yield from standard EEG to 24 hour EEGs to MEG.

14, 24 h EEGs

64

35 MEG

97

Hashimoto et al., 2001

68

54%

76.6% frontal

Yes

Additional ASD 18 subjects with epilepsy had a rate of paroxysmal discharges of 72%.

Hrdlicka et al. 2004

50

15%

 

Yes

An additional 9% of non-epileptic ASD children had non-paroxysmal EEG abnormalities.nWhen subjects were classified into those with and without regression, rate of paroxysmal EEg abnormality rose to 44%.

Reinhold et al., 2005

316 (overnight EEG monitoring)

26.8%

Temporal (38%), frontal (28%), central (23%), occipital (8%).

Yes

EEG monitoring recommended for ASD work-up and more so if regression is seen.

Gabis et al., 2005

40

3.6

 

Yes

Lowest rate reported. No obvious difference either in the study population or EEG procedure used.

Canitano et al., 2005

40

25%

Mostly focal but few multifocal.

Yes

 

Hughes & Melyn, 2005

32

19%

21% had bilateral spike discharges.

Yes

 

Chez et al., 2006

889 Overnight (at least 6 hours) EEGs.

60.7%

Right Frontal (21.5%), Bitemporal (20.2%). Gen sp& wave (16.2%), left temp (15.2%).

Yes and unmedicated at times of EEGs.

No difference in rate of EEG abnormality between those with and without regression. All paroxysmal activity were recorded only during sleep. Of 176 patients with paroxysmal activity and treated with valproic acid rate of EEG abnormalities decreased to 36% with follow-up EEGs.

Hara, 2007

97

21%

Mainly temporal but also central/parietal. A minority had focal foci.

Yes

Epileptiform EEGs predicted subsequent seizures.

Ošlejšková et al., 2008

57

42.5

Abnormalities were mainly focal but specific locations not reported

Yes

Children with no evidence of regression

Ošlejšková et al., 2008

41

57.8

Children with history of regression

Å°nal et al., 2009

81

27.2

Mainly temporal regions

Yes

Only 8.3 % of children without evidence of impaired intellectual development had abnormal EEGs.

Hartley-McAndrew and weinstock, 2010

15

33

Focal spike and wave complexes, different locations.

Yes

Six additional ASD children had history of seizures and 83% abnormalities. The study suggest that in the absence of fraak epilepsy, signs like starring, automatism or shaking episodes are not good predictors of abnormal EEGs.

Parmeggiani et al., 2010

259

31%

Temporal and central 31.4%. Much less frontal.

Yes

Seizures and EEG PA were not related to autistic regression.

Ekinci et al., 2010

51

8%

 

Yes

No relation between severity of intellectual dysfunction and presence of IEDs

Kanemura et al., 2013

21

50%

Frontal, central and temporal.

Yes

The presence of frontal paroxysms was significantly associated with later development of epilepsy compared with centrotemporal paroxysmus

  1. *It was possible to decide the number of ASD subjects with no history of epilepsy and the prevalence of paroxysmal EEG abnormalities in this sample.